Clip of quote: Miss Lamont, would you characterise that as a duo-directional lipus-lockus? Clip of quote: Miss Lamont, would you characterise that as a duo-directional lipus-lockus? Yarn is the best way to find video clips by quote. Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. Easily move forward or backward to get to the perfect spot. It's available on the web and also on Android and iOS.
Miss Lamont, would you characterise that as a duo-directional lipus-lockus?
PREV CLIP
Miss Lamont, would you characterise that as a duo-directional lipus-lockus?
NEXT CLIP
Like Embed Gif Story Make Meme Share
😎
😐
😂
😘
😳
😍
Background
Moonlighting (1985) - S05E06 Take My Wife, for Example
4.6s
There's nothing more deadly than a duo-directional lipus-lockus.
Background
Inside Man (2022) - S01E01 Episode #1.1
2.4s
I would characterise it as begging.
Background
Whiplash (2014)
3.4s
Would you characterise his conduct as extreme, Andrew?
Background
Whiplash (2014)
3.4s
Would you characterise his conduct as extreme, Andrew?
Background
Missing Link
5.7s
Would you please direct us to Gamu?
Background
Sanford and Son (1972) - S01E07 A Pad for Lamont
2.3s
That means you, miss! Out!
Background
Singin' in the Rain
3.2s
Are you doing anything tonight, Miss Lamont?
Background
Singin' in the Rain
2.8s
It was a thrill working with you, Miss Lamont.
Background
Sanford and Son (1972) - S01E07 A Pad for Lamont
2.4s
Who is that? That you, Lamont?
Background
King Ralph
4.1s
is now being characterised as "a breath of fresh air".
Background
Cheers (1982) - S07E04 One Happy Chappy in a Snappy Serape
1.3s
Now, that Would be directing.
Background
Moonlighting (1985) - S05E11 In 'N Outlaws
3.4s
And how would you characterise the relationship of your bosses:
Background
MacGyver (2016) - S01E03 Awl
1.5s
as a directional antenna,
Background
Missing Link
2.5s
in a different direction.
Background
Beautiful Girls
5.1s
Tommy, don't try to characterise my marriage as a bad one.
Background
Sanford and Son (1972) - S01E07 A Pad for Lamont
3.2s
Well, as long as you put it that way...